Symmetry, synchrony\/coherence and assessments should always be linked because they are training comparisons or relationships between the two channels. Comparing each channel against a separate reference allows error to creep into the measurements by adding another variable (the signal at the reference) to change the apparent relationship.<\/p>\n
The jumper\/linked references allow you to combine the signals from the two reference sites, and compares each of the actives against exactly the same value. I guess you could say that \u201czeroes out\u201d the references, but I\u2019d say it just equalizes them. They\u2019re still subtracted from the active sites to give you the signal.<\/p>\n
If you are using a COMMON reference (e.g. F3\/A1\/g\/C3\/A1\u2013both channels using A1): YES, link.<\/p>\n
If you are using LINKED reference for \u201ccomparative\u201d training (e.g. coherence\/synchrony, symmetry, assessment): YES, link.
\nIf you are doing \u201csummed\u201d training (squish, squash, windowed squash), use it if you wish, not if you don\u2019t. Doesn\u2019t matter.<\/p>\n
Otherwise use independent references, meaning that the link button should NOT be on.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Linking Training Sites Symmetry, synchrony\/coherence and assessments should always be linked because they are training comparisons or relationships between the two channels. Comparing each channel against a separate reference allows error to creep into the measurements by adding another variable (the signal at the reference) to change the apparent relationship. The jumper\/linked references allow you […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":112,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":19,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"topic":[789],"class_list":["post-39842","answer","type-answer","status-publish","hentry","answer_topic-making-sessions-run-better"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n